Comparison between Hector and GMapping

Figure 1: Maps generated in Corridor in live time. a) Gmapping (b) Hector SLAM
Figure 2: Maps generated in Room in live time. a) Gmapping (b) Hector SLAM
Figure 3: Comparison of maps obtained using different SLAM techniques and scan types in [4.50m x 3.ISm] room, without any features present
Figure 4: Maps obtained using different SLAM techniques on known features. The red arrow indicates the shorter feature being mapped.
TABLE: PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN GMAPPING AND HECTOR SLAM.

--

--

--

Robotics Enthusiast. Well versed with computer vision, path planning algorithms, SLAM and ROS

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

AI-900: Exam Questions – Part 2

Face Detection using MTCNN

Neural Networks Part 2: Backpropagation and Gradient Checking

TensorFlow: Sarcasm Detection in 20 mins

Accuracy and Loss graphs for Train vs Test Datasets.

Difference between Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

BioBERT — Insights

Revolutional, Convolutional Neural Nets

Can we teach a computer quantum mechanics? (Part I)

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Dibyendu Biswas

Dibyendu Biswas

Robotics Enthusiast. Well versed with computer vision, path planning algorithms, SLAM and ROS

More from Medium

What is Light Fidelity (Li-Fi) ?

Why waiving vaccine patents may not be on the table at EU-AU Summit

The Sydney Opera House Effect

Wallsend Cranes At The End of Fenham Hall Drive When They Should Be In Wallsend

Drones — the newest attraction at theme parks